🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Reconsider Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The court also overturned a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials assert that municipal police have command of the circumstances.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the use of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to circumvent the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of state troops – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, preventing the physical sending of the forces.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot dispatch the armed forces into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”